Intelligent Design Advocates: Are Darwinists Afraid to Debate ID? | Christianpost.com

<<snippet>> 

“Various science professors at SMU have called on their university to ban our conference, and more recently some of them have declared that they ‘have a duty as practitioners of science to speak out’ against intelligent design,” read the article in the Dallas Morning News. “But if they truly believe that they have a duty to ‘speak out,’ why not speak out by engaging intelligent design scholars in a serious discussion?”

Source: Intelligent Design Advocates: Are Darwinists Afraid to Debate Us? | Christianpost.com

The rest of this article is well written and worth the reading.

I would think scientists would relish a joust of opinion.  After all, as the article posted by Intelligent Design in the Dallas Morning News stated,

 “. . . refusal to have scientific debate and discussion is contrary to Darwin himself, who felt that “a fair result can be obtained only by fully stating and balancing the facts and arguments on both sides of each question.”

I think it is crazy to keep ignoring ID.  Albert Einstein said, “To keep doing the same thing, expecting a different result, is a sign of insanity.”  Constantly ignoring ID is not going to make it go away.   What do you think?